10 Things Star Trek Does Better Than Star Wars

Sci - fi lover are divided on which is well : Star TrekorStar Wars ? They ’re both huge franchise with flick , TV show , book , video games , toys , and funny book all revolving around adventures in space and battles between foreign force . But other than those vague similarities , they are completely different stories about completely different characters .

The Sojourner Truth is that there really is no definitive answer in the debate over which is better . There are some thing thatStar Warsdoes better thanStar Trekand some thingsStar Trekdoes better thanStar Wars . Here are 10 ThingsStar TrekDoes Better ThanStar Wars .

Science

The skill inStar Trekis far better laid out than the science inStar Wars , because the limitations have been gear up from the beginning . In eachStar Warsmovie , something raw can be done with the established technology that could n’t before . Nothing about how the Death Star or the Star Destroyers or the Millennium Falcon work is fully excuse , and we study new thing about them all the time .

Meanwhile , the Holodeck is fully fleshed out . Communicators were actually invented a few decades afterThe Original Seriesaired ( they ’re cell earphone ) . transporter do n’t always function and often lead to “ transporter accidents , ” which make them feel more genuine , and a teleportation equipment like them will be invented for real by the conclusion of this century , according to physicist Michio Kaku . Star Trekdoes science far better thanStar Wars .

Morality

The moral compass ofStar Trekis a spate stronger than that ofStar Wars . InStar Wars , Anakin Skywalker is entirely redeem and remembered as a hero just because he saved his son ’s life at the last second , while all the racial extermination and state of war crimes he was responsible for as Darth Vader are only swept under the carpet .

Meanwhile , Star Trekstudies these issue in much more depth . The captain ’s logic is sometimes question by the crew ; the mogul structure is more democratic inStar Trek , whereasStar Warsis about a royal family placed in power merely due to their regal origin .

Dialogue

While Carrie Fisher did her best to fix the dialogue in George Lucas’Star Warsscripts on the set during filming , it still came off as wooden and ham - fisted . Neither dealership is going for dialogue that accurately represent how material people verbalize to one another , since both are fix in a heightened reality .

However , Star Trek ’s dialogue flows a raft better thanStar war ’ dialogue and it hits the auricle in a more satisfying way . And yet , Star Trekalso has its fair share of catchphrases and universally applicable quotes : “ Live long and prosper , ” “ radiate me up , Scotty , ” “ To boldly go … ” etc .

Utilizing J.J. Abrams

While J.J. Abrams abandon hisStar Trekseries to unite theStar Warssaga , his contributions toTrekwere much unspoiled . He stay true to the characters and style ofThe Original Series , while also modernizing them . He also modernized the look of the show , stay true to the iconic set excogitation while making it look and sense like a slick , big - budget 21st one C megahit .

Abrams’sStar Trekmovies made sheer pick with tone and story and parallel cosmos , while still being faithful to classicTrekmythology . Plus , his crystalline lens flares were more suited toTrekthanWars . On the other hand , hisStar Warsmovie rate nostalgia over anything else , so we ’re left with a kind of soft remake ofA New Hopefull of call - backs . Time will enjoin ifEpisode IXis an improvement overThe Force Awakens , but after the mess ofThe Last Jedi , it ’s improbable .

Realism

WhileStar Warsis all made - up , Star Trekis at least ground in some reality . The Original Seriespremiered in 1966 , right between the landmarks of the first person live on to infinite and the Moon landing . As far as anyone was concerned , the futurity was all about space traveling .

The wild sci - fi concepts ofForbidden Planetwere chop-chop becoming a reality , so Gene Roddenberry lay out out to create a sci - fi series that was as establish in world – or “ succeeding world ” – as possible , and the resultant role is startlingly efficacious . Roddenberry severalise stories about multitude chit-chat far - off planets in the upstage future in a way that feel real .

Romance

The romantic storyline inStar Trekare a lot stronger than the I inStar Wars . InStar Wars , the only romance that has ever worked is Han and Leia ’s , and even that is build on unrealistic emotion . The Padme / Anakin wild-eyed plot from the prequel trilogy is infamously and interminably boring .

Meanwhile , Star Trekhas had a issue of great romances over the years : Captain Kirk and Edith Keeler , Captain Picard and Nella Daren , Will Riker and Deanna Troi . The love lives of Kirk and Picard are far more complex than those of anyone in theStar Warsuniverse . Plus , the relationship between Spock and Uhura has been beautifully delineate in the reboot trilogy .

Villains

Do n’t get me wrong , Darth Vader is perchance the greatest scoundrel ever created . But on the whole , Star Trekhas more expectant baddie thanStar Wars . Besides Vader , the only other groovy scoundrel in theStar Warssaga are Darth Maul and General Grievous , who lack depth and are simply beloved for their nerveless aesthetical , and Emperor Palpatine .

The lean of greatStar Trekvillains is eternal : Khan , Q , the Borg , the Dominion , the Klingons , the Romulans , the Doomsday Machine , the reference from the Mirror Universe . The villains ofStar Trekhave depth and material motivations in improver to looking coolheaded .

Diversity

TheStar Trekfranchise is right smart more diverse than theStar Warsfranchise . Star Trek : The Original Serieshad three fair sex in its main cast , include a black woman , and a merry Asiatic human beings .

Star Wars , meanwhile , is about a bunch of white men seek to save a whitened woman who ’s been captured by ashen men . There ’s one disgraceful fiber in each trilogy . The novel Disney movies have fixed this with a woman , a black man , and a Hispanic man play the independent characters . But even then , theStar Warsfranchise has only been that divers since 2015 , while theStar Trekfranchise has been that diverse since 1966 .

Character dynamics

The dynamic of Kirk and Spock that is key to whatStar Trekis build on is great than the character kinetics inStar Wars . Kirk remember and acts out of emotion , while Spock think and behave out of system of logic . This makes them both best friends and strong adversaries .

The emotion vs. logic slant has been used beautifully to produce dramatic play inStar Trek , like Spock ’s sacrifice at the end ofThe Wrath of Khanthat Kirk never would ’ve allowed . The case dynamics inStar Wars , on the other hand , are more often than not religious vs. doubter , Force believer vs. non - Force believers , and it ’s not as effective .

Star Trek : The Original Seriesaired in the sixties , at the same metre asThe Twilight Zone , and it had the same shine sociopolitical overtones as Rod Serling ’s classic anthology series . Star Warsmovies have never had any overall societal musical theme or made any point about our guild . They ’re pure escapism .

Meanwhile , Gene Roddenberry was using a distant future outer space lay out to tell stories about our world . episode ofStar Trektackled current issues like racism , sexism , patriotism , war , and the establishment . Those stories have so much more meaning that the ones set in a utter fantasy land in a coltsfoot far , far away .