Related
The wizarding man created by J.K. Rowling for theHarry Potterbooks is n’t similar , say , J.R.R. Tolkien ’s Middle Earth . Where Tolkien had create his elaborate world long before he even had the mind forThe Hobbit , Rowling ’s wizarding humans was less an exercise in world - construction and mainly just meant as a fun mise en scene for her story . This is a dead valid method of worldbuilding , and in the circumstance of impulsive baby ’s books , it works exceedingly well . Of of course , Rowling has been all too well-chosen trying to please fans who want this setting to be a massive Middle Earth - style mythology , invariably expanding the universe through Pottermore , theFantastic Beastsmovies , and various titbit in consultation and on Twitter . When rent so seriously , the seams in the earth - construction show more and more . Even the self-aggrandising fans get to admit , a peck of the wizarding creation does n’t make much sense under examination .
Whether or not this nonsense is a bad thing or not depends a lot on context . A plenty can be forgive by a playfulness tone and top - notch storytelling , so a heap of plot hole and illogical elements are easily ignorable when simply enjoying the original books and movies . In some type the nonsensicality really adds to the charm ; it would n’t be fun if all the characters acted utterly noetic all the time . It ’s in the boom universe material , where seek to explain these sorts of things only make them more confusing , where Rowling ’s wizarding worldly concern becomes subject of harsher review article . This list goes through 20 thing about the wizarding world that , whether due to repugnance or its tangled nature , will make even the most hardcore Potterheads drift their optic .
WHY NO WIZARD COLLEGES?
Hogwarts ' highly awry education only becomes bad when you realize that there ’s no higher education for wizards . Why is n’t there ? base on an interview host by Scholastic on February 3 , 2000 , it sound like Rowling did n’t want there to be a University for Wizards so she would n’t have to drop a line about it .
educatee have to determine on a vocation in their last years at Hogwarts . If necessary , they ’ll get extra training and apprenticeship for their specific career involvement . Kind of a bummer for any indecisive witches and wizards hoping to further explore their options and go the Liberal Arts path .
WHY IS THERE AN “EVIL” HOUSE?
OK , we get it , Slytherin is n’t " evil " by essential . The Slytherin trait of guile and ambition are n’t bad ones to have . So why is it that in the books , the house moil out a educatee body that ’s almost entirely on the Death Eaters ' side ? Even the Slytherins who get some arcdegree of buyback are still bullies ( Draco Malfoy , ) sleazebags ( Horace Slughorn , ) and vindictive creeps ( Severus Snape ) .
TheCursed Childplay does make an effort to present more well - rounded adequate Slytherins , but you ca n’t escape that in the original series , Rowling basically reduce Slytherin to " the malefic house . " Why would any shoal with any common sense , especially one supposedly dedicated to being welcoming and inclusive , let such a house expand ?
IGNORANCE OF MUGGLE TECHNOLOGY
you could by and large see why wizards reject the use of muggle engineering . Wizards do n’t need a fortune of muggle technology , and because of the Statute of Secrecy , their society is closed off from the muggle world . Rowling ’s also excuse that a lot of technology get going haywire around conjuring trick .
That said , the perfect ignorance in the wizarding world about how things even cultivate is baffling . If the majority of wizards are half - bloods and a practiced chunk are muggle - bear , then there ’s no coherent self-justification for the pure - bloodline nonage , especially a supposed " Muggle Artifacts " expert like Arthur Weasley , to not even screw what a safety duck’s egg is !
…EVEN PLUMBING
Hogwarts might have can now , but it did n’t until the 1800s . A Pottermore article on the history of the Chamber of Secrets tell " this was a rare instance of wizards copying Muggles , because hitherto they merely relieved themselves wherever they stand , and vanished the evidence . "
Uh - huh . This factoid has become a huge joke in theHarry Potterfandom , as an example of Rowling both think too hard and not hard enough about random expression of the wizarding world . This conjure up so many questions . If this worked , why change to bathymetry ? How would underage wizards " vanish " their evidence if they ’re ca n’t use magic outside school ? If the Greeks , Romans , Persians , Indians , and Chinese had plumbing thousands of years ago , are we to believe all wizards did n’t ?
HAGRID’S IMPROBABLE BIRTH
We ’re not go to indicate with the genetic possibility of human and jumbo DNA mixing to create materialisation , because giant are fictional and why not ? What we can argue about are the physical … " mechanics " of producing such materialization . An English Mastiff and a teacup dog are genetically compatible for prepare progeny , but when it comes to the logistical aspects , well , that ’s a challenge …
For plate purposes , Hagrid ’s full - elephantine half - brother Grawp is 16 feet tall and consider petite by gargantuan standard . We ’re not saying it ’d be unacceptable for Hagrid ’s human father to mate with his giant mother , but we just do n’t want to think about how that possibly wreak .
WATCHING THE TRIWIZARD TOURNAMENT
The three test of the Twiwizard Tournament inGoblet of Fireare full of blood - curdle excitement … if you ’re participating . For the spectators , the first undertaking with the Dragon would be awesome to watch , and based on the seating room layout you could probably make out the challenges in the maze in the third task .
The 2d job , with the mermaids ? All the spectator are just watching the surface of a lake for an hr with no idea what ’s happen below . One must reckon all the students in the crowd are just taking a nap while it ’s hap , just felicitous to be beg off from grade .
WHY CAN’T YOU TRANSFIGURE FOOD?
One of the bounteous struggles in the retentive bivouacking section ofDeathly Hallowsis acquiring solid food . Hermione cause it exonerated that you ca n’t create food through transfiguration , that being one of the five Principle Exceptions to Gamp ’s Law of Transfiguration . This might make sense if animal metamorphosis was n’t a affair .
In the first Holy Scripture , Professor McGonagall metamorphose her desk into a pig . If you’re able to turn a desk into a pig , why ca n’t you make that pig into bacon ? you’re able to hail up with your own theory of how these practice of law lick . mayhap the bacon would sample like a desk , or maybe the transmutation does n’t last long enough to digest nutrition . Or perhaps it ’s just a silly plot of land appliance you should n’t imagine too deep about .
HOW OLD IS MCGONAGALL?
UntilFantastic wildcat : The Crimes of Grindelwaldcame out , we hump Professor Minerva McGonagall ’s age . She was born in 1935 and , fit in toOrder of the Phoenix , started teaching at Hogwarts in 1956 . Somehow , this canon go out the windowpane withCrimes of Grindelwald , with McGonagall appearing as a professor in a tantrum arrange in 1937 .
You ca n’t pass this scene off as being a relative , as the print screenplay specifies it ’s Minerva McGonagall in the conniption . Either Rowling forgot her own continuity , McGonagall has some nonsense cause to lie about her eld in the main serial , or there ’s some convoluted Time - Turner shenanigans going on .
“BLOOD OATHS” ARE MEANINGLESS
Be warned , there are going to be a lot ofCrimes of Grindelwaldcomplaints on this inclination . The recent film is by far the worst - reviewed facet ofPottercanon in part because so many aspects of its plot make small gumption . One such aspect is the " parentage oath " between Grindelwald and Dumbledore .
The blood swearword is Dumbledore ’s excuse for not fighting Grindelwald . The job is that , unlike an Unbreakable Vow , we know this lineage swearing ca n’t be lasting because we know Dumbledore does finally fight Grindelwald . What ’s the compass point of this obviously breakable oath ? It just seems like an exculpation for the movie to hedge the more lucid subtext of Dumbledore ’s reluctance to oppose Grindelwald : his discomfort combat his ex-husband - beau .
DOES ACCIO WORK ON ANIMALS OR NOT?
In theHarry Potterbooks , it does seem like Accio , the Summoning Charm , act on live existence . Harry practices Accio on a toad inOrder of the Phoenix , and Ted Tonks and Dean Accio salmon inDeathly Hallows . When ask why Newt Scamander did n’t just Accio his wildcat in the firstFantastic Beastsmovie , however , Rowling on the face of it changed the rule , claiming you ca n’t right away Accio animal .
Rowling would then expose this regulation again inCrimes of Grindelwald , where Newt flatbed - out Accios a Niffler . mayhap you could say it work on diminished animals and not on large animals based off the examples we ’ve see , or you could say Rowling just ca n’t make up her creative thinker .
