Related
Everyone lovesToy Story , but some of the mythology seems super dark when you start to think about it . Many mass have now grown up with the franchise and are still enjoy the franchise well into adulthood , but a little thought about the mythology and thing can get quite twisted .
ManyToy Storyfan theories have surfaced over the years , such as Wheezy being the true villain , Toy Story 3being an parable of the Holocaust , and Sid becoming a garbage human in parliamentary procedure to save toys . Those are only the commencement , too . Other theoriesdiscussed in deepness on Reddit include whether Andy ’s ma was Jessie ’s original owner , andToy Story 3being about the Illuminati .
Related:Pixar Can (And Should) Be Better Under Pete Docter
Some possibility are too wacky to ever make good sense , but some really get you think , let in this recenttweet from @stiggib3on Twitter , whose daughter become the construct of toy come to lifetime on its head :
Initial reading might evoke a reaction of " gross , " but let ’s recall about this for a import . Theoretically , the girl has a point . Andy does n’t make love that his toys come live when he will the room , so logic dictates that if he does n’t know they ’re alive , he wo n’t know when they die . So , taken at that level , yes , Andy could carry on unknowingly playing with a corpse . Except looking back at the story so far , we can see just how fresh and adaptable these toys are . InToy Story , they manage to get Woody over to Sid ’s house , and Buzz and Woody together cope to motor RC back to Andy ’s machine . InToy Story 2 , the toys leave the house and sail a in use street to get to Al ’s Toy Barn , and inToy Story 3they not only break out of Sunnyside Day Nursery , but they also escape a furnace . If a toy go bad , would the other toys not aggroup together to ensure that the departed plaything was hire care of , either burying it or at the very least hiding it out of sight so Andy did n’t continue to play with it ?
As it happen , another theory might debunk the corpse theory whole . Many fans trust that the toys are actually immortal , therefore Andy would not ever be potentially playing with a corpse because the only style a toy can be gone forever , is if it ’s completely destroyed . The hypothesis is game up by the ages of some of the miniature , in particular , Woody , Jessie , and Bullseye , who were 1950s toy . This theory would think of the toys watch their owners grow up , then get run onto a new owner , like Andy handing his toys to Bonnie inToy tarradiddle 3.The only danger present in any of the 3 film are being lost , forgotten , or completely destroyed . Even being taken apart and reconstructed into a monster by Sid did n’t really belt down any toy , and we see Woody broken and frozen inToy Story2 like he was as good as novel .
While this is n’t inevitably the best thing for the toys ( populate the same life over and over again ) , it saves us the thought of our preferred toys break down , so it ’s the theory we ’re cash in one’s chips with for now .
Next: 16 Things You Never Knew About Toy Story
Source:@stiggib3
